IFSWF Santiago Principles

Santiago Principles Self-Assessment®

HCAP 2025

    Institutional Framework and Governance Structure.
    Principle 6

    6. The governance framework for the SWF should be sound and establish a clear and effective division of roles and responsibilities in order to facilitate accountability and operational independence in the management of the SWF to pursue its objectives.

    The fund’s law provides for clear operational independence from the State. Furthermore, a supplementary arm’s length provision is included: to detach the fund’s management appointment from political cycles, the fund’s Board of Directors is selected by the CGC and not by its General Assembly, in contrast to general corporate legislation.

     

    The fund’s CGC is responsible for the evaluation, selection, and revoke of the fund’s Board Members “BoD”) based on criteria and targets that serve the fund’s mission.

     

    The fund’s law clearly states each body’s responsibilities to achieve operational independence and mission fulfilment. This means that although the fund is flagged as a GGE for statistical and fiscal purposes, it is outside the core public sector.

     

    The State provides the fund with high-level objectives for 3-5 years and an annual privatization plan (Asset Development Plan – “ADP”) as the fund is a key tool of economic policy. However, the fund and its management have full independence when deciding the strategies and specific targets, upon which the CGC evaluates them annually.

    7. The owner should set the objectives of the SWF, appoint the members of its governing body(ies) in accordance with clearly defined procedures, and exercise oversight over the SWF’s operations.

    The owner and sole shareholder, the MoEF, sets its high-level objectives in the Strategic Guidelines, as provided by the fund’s law. Furthermore, the fund is entrusted with a pool of assets earmarked for privatization for which the State approves a pipeline (ADP) and status report, bi-annually. These assets are not included in the Fund’s Strategic Plan, as they are only eligible for maturing / development process and the strategy has already been set by the State.

     

    It is then the fund's responsibility to transform these guidelines into a strategic plan and proceed with the privatizations, serving the public interest. Once the Plan is articulated, it is submitted to the shareholder for approval so that the owner can confirm the alignment of the fund’s objectives with the state’s objectives. Furthermore, each privatization transaction (depending on the amount received) may be submitted to the Court of Audit for final sign off / approval.

     

    The Strategic Plan provides the basis for the fund’s Business Plan and annual budget (excluding privatization targets). The oversight and alignment of the fund’s operations are achieved by submitting its annual statements to the General Assembly for approval and subsequent release from liability for the BoD members.

     

    Key Strategic Targets, value map, along with the fund’s current Strategic Plan are publicly available on the Fund’s website: https://growthfund.gr/en/about-us/strategy/ 

    8. The governing body(ies) should act in the best interests of the SWF, and have a clear mandate and adequate authority and competency to carry out its functions.

    The fund’s governing body is its Board of Directors. 

     

    The Board’s obligations are clearly stated in the fund’s founding law and are supplemented by provisions of corporate law and the fund’s statute. 

     

    Key obligations of the BoD include strategy setting, in alignment with the State’s guidelines. The Board of the fund is responsible for its performance. 

     

    The law also provides the minimum competencies for the fund’s Board Members, providing a supplementary safety net to attract adequate members to carry out the fund’s functions.

     

    9. The operational management of the SWF should implement the SWF’s strategies in an independent manner and in accordance with clearly defined responsibilities.

    As stated in previous GAPPs, Growthfund’s management is completely independent from the State, by virtue of being appointed by an independent Corporate Governance Council, and its responsibilities are clearly defined in the fund’s law (including the fund’s statute). 

     

    The fund’s executive management is responsible for the day – to – day operations and staffing under the scope of the fund’s organizational chart in place. All in all, and following the absorption of the HRADF and the HFSF separate business units have been created in the fund’s chart with different reporting lines for each unit, representing the ex- subsidiaries. The fund’s organizational chart in place can be found here: https://growthfund.gr/en/about-us/organizational-chart/ 

     

    The Board of the fund is responsible for taking investment decisions, following relevant proposal(s) of the fund’s Investment Committee. Specifically for divestment decisions, there may be need for a GA resolution as well (depending on the asset category).

     

    10. The accountability framework for the SWF’s operations should be clearly defined in the relevant legislation, charter, other constitutive documents, or management agreement.

    The fund’s accountability framework is clearly defined and stated in its founding legislation: a) As a Societe Anonyme, the fund is obliged to report based on the requirements of corporate law b)The fund’s law provides for additional reporting on a quarterly and semi- annual basis, following “as-if-listed” standards. 

     

    Moreover, the Fund already follows international standards and guidelines on sustainability reporting thus issuing a group sustainability report on an annual basis. The fund encourages its subsidiaries to also submit an annual sustainability report. 

     

    All the fund’s reports are published on the fund’s website: https://growthfund.gr/en/reports/ 

     

    Lastly, the fund is obliged by law to report its annual statements to the Parliament, as provided by the Parliament’s operations regulation. 

    11. An annual report and accompanying financial statements on the SWF’s operations and performance should be prepared in a timely fashion and in accordance with recognized international or national accounting standards in a consistent manner.

    The fund’s annual (standalone and consolidated) statements are prepared according to the IFRS and strictly follow the rules that the Greek corporate law provides related to timing and publication. Specifically, the consolidated statement incorporates all assets performance, as already reported in their standalone statements. 

     

    Regarding off-balance sheet items, these are not included in the fund’s annual statement, as: a) this is not necessary under Greek corporate law b) most of the fund’s off balance sheet items are Real Estate properties that are gradually being valued and thus reported; .based on IFRS& IAS provisions,  real estate properties are valued on an annual basis and their valuation is conducted by an independent valuator. This process includes assets already included in the Fund’s previous years’ statements, plus new assets recognized as mature enough to be valued. The pool of off-balance sheet assets was created through the bulk transfer of those to the Fund in 2016, without them having the necessary information or titles to be valued. Growthfund and its subsidiaries are assigned with the responsibility to clear their assets registry, among other ways, through valuation. 

    12. The SWF’s operations and financial statements should be audited annually in accordance with recognized international or national auditing standards in a consistent manner.

    The fund’s annual financial statements are audited by renowned external auditors in cooperation with the fund’s Audit Committee. 

     

    Furthermore, the fund’s semi-annual statements are also surveyed by external auditors based on a relevant provision by the fund’s law (this is not obligatory according to Greek corporate law. However, it is a supplementary provision to the fund’s framework).

     

    In addition to this, the fund has established and Internal Audit Unit that conducts ad-hoc audits for a series of operational issues, with direct reporting line to the fund’s Audit Committee. It is worth mentioning that the Head of the Internal Audit Unit (IAU) cannot be revoked by the fund’s executive management. The founding law provides that the Head can be revoked only through a BoD decision.

     

    13. Professional and ethical standards should be clearly defined and made known to the members of the SWF’s governing body(ies), management, and staff.

    Some key professional standards for the members of the governing bodies are already set in the fund’s law. Supplementary criteria are also set by the fund’s CGC (not to be disclosed).

     

    In addition, the fund has built a strong compliance function that oversees and promotes ethical standards for the governing bodies, management, and staff. Furthermore, there is a separate chapter in the fund’s internal regulation that regulates conflict of interest. For all members of the Board there is a Directors & Officers Liability insurance in place. 

     

    Regarding the managers and rest of the staff, all emoloyees have job descriptions related to the fund’s organizational chart.

     

    The interaction of roles and responsibilities is clear as it is described as a set of internal processes that are documented and available to the fund’s employees on its intranet.

    14. Dealing with third parties for the purpose of the SWF’s operational management should be based on economic and financial grounds, and follow clear rules and procedures.

    All dealings with third parties are based on economic and financial grounds and are covered by the relevant policies. For instance, the fund’s procurement policy is based on the public procurement law. Additionally, the procurement process through the Project Preparation Facility (PPF) follows strict rules set out in relevant legislation.

     

    In addition to the above, the fund’s law also provides that the dealings between the fund’s subsidiaries should be done at arm’s length and on purely commercial and financial grounds (unless not applicable).

    15. SWF operations and activities in host countries should be conducted in compliance with all applicable regulatory and disclosure requirements of the countries in which they operate.

    The fund operates solely in Greece and thus abides to all relevant legislation that includes:  a) The Constitution b) Local Corporate law c) Local listed company law d) Hellenic Capital Markets regulation e) EU and local State Aid legislation f) Other EU and local directives that regulate issues relevant to urban transportation, energy, banking and all other sectors that the fund’s subsidiaries operate in. 

    16. The governance framework and objectives, as well as the manner in which the SWF’s management is operationally independent from the owner, should be publicly disclosed.

    The fund's institutional framework defines the governance framework of the fund, its objectives, and how it is managed. This is publicly available both on the Government Gazette and the fund’s corporate webpage. Furthermore, the fund includes extensive relevant reporting and links to its annually published statements

    17. Relevant financial information regarding the SWF should be publicly disclosed to demonstrate its economic and financial orientation, so as to contribute to stability in international financial markets and enhance trust in recipient countries.

    Regarding the actual performance: the fund’s audited (standalone and group) statements are compiled based on IFRS and published annually following their approval by the fund’s General Assembly (MoEF).

    Regarding the financial orientation / direction: the fund’s 3 – year planning is publicly disclosed, through the disclosure of its Strategic Plan on the fund’s website. Furthermore, the fund’s Strategic Plan is also discussed in a relevant Parliamentary Committee, providing in this way full disclosure of the fund’s plans. 

    Investment and Risk Management Framework.

    Principle 18

    18. The SWF’s investment policy should be clear and consistent with its defined objectives, risk tolerance, and investment strategy, as set by the owner or the governing body(ies), and be based on sound portfolio management principles.

    18.1. The investment policy should guide the SWF’s financial risk exposures and the possible use of leverage.

    18.2. The investment policy should address the extent to which internal and/or external investment managers are used, the range of their activities and authority, and the process by which they are selected and their performance monitored.

    18.3. A description of the investment policy of the SWF should be publicly disclosed.

    The fund’s Investment Policy is an integral part of its Internal Regulation, thus approved by its General Assembly. The current Investment Policy is available on the fund’s site under the section of Corporate Governance: https://growthfund.gr/en/corporate-governance/internal-regulation/ 

     

    The policy provides for broad objectives and asset classes. It also provides for further specialization in the fund’s Technical Supplement that is a working document approved by the General Assembly. 

     

    The fund’s technical supplement provides for all the necessary details required for a transaction to take place, including (not exhaustively): a) technical terms to achieve clarity b) detailed guidelines with limits per asset class c) risk management approaches d) investment selection criteria (economical, financial, ESG) e) detailed description of the investment process including delegation of authorities f) guidelines on benchmarking g) reporting process engaging all stakeholders (Investment Committee, Board of Directors, public, etc).

     

    19. The SWF’s investment decisions should aim to maximize risk-adjusted financial returns in a manner consistent with its investment policy, and based on economic and financial grounds.

    19.1. If investment decisions are subject to other than economic and financial considerations, these should be clearly set out in the investment policy and be publicly disclosed.

    19.2. The management of an SWF’s assets should be consistent with what is generally accepted as sound asset management principles.

    Growthfund’s Investments framework (Policy & Technical Supplement) provides for five key asset classes that differ from each other in terms of returns and risk parameters. These five asset classes constitute the fund’s strategic and tactical asset allocation, approved by its shareholder, ensuring a proper balance between return, risk and policy-making, if applicable. Each targeted asset class refers to and is gauged against specific benchmarks, making Growthfund’s investments transparent and having clear and defined returns, ex-ante.

     

    Furthermore, the fund’s policy provides for investing for reasons other than financial or economic returns,

    e.g. in distressed companies that need to be supported to deliver public policy objectives.

     

    The management of the fund’s portfolio (both the legacy portfolio and the portfolio acquired through investments) is managed through generally accepted asset management principles, as in its totality, it has to achieve the return and overall targets set by the sole shareholder in its Strategic Guidelines and the relevant Strategic Plan.

    20. The SWF should not seek or take advantage of privileged information or inappropriate influence by the broader government in competing with private entities.

    The fund is obliged by its institutional framework to operate in good business terms overall. Furthermore, the fund must abide by the rules of competition set out in the EU’s competition framework.

    21. SWFs view shareholder ownership rights as a fundamental element of their equity investments’ value. If an SWF chooses to exercise its ownership rights, it should do so in a manner that is consistent with its investment policy and protects the financial value of its investments. The SWF should publicly disclose its general approach to voting securities of listed entities, including the key factors guiding its exercise of ownership rights.

    The fund’s ownership rights are covered by the sole shareholder’s Strategic Guidelines; in it, the Minister of Finance, states the minimum participation percentages that they wishes for the fund to maintain in the forthcoming years. The fund can suggest some deviation from the Minister’s guidelines. However, this requires approval by its General Assembly.

     

    The fund exercises its ownership rights in a prudent manner, respecting several bylaws that cover its’ subsidiaries’ operations, such as the Greek corporate law, the law for the listed entities and so on.

     

    Lastly, the fund is represented on the boards of its subsidiaries by Growthfund employees appointed as representatives. These members are asked to follow a specific policy and seek internal consensus before voting on a series of important issues, such as the subsidiary’s annual budget, any strategic or business plans, and so on.

    22. The SWF should have a framework that identifies, assesses, and manages the risks of its operations.

    22.1. The risk management framework should include reliable information and timely reporting systems, which should enable the adequate monitoring and management of relevant risks within acceptable parameters and levels, control and incentive mechanisms, codes of conduct, business continuity planning, and an independent audit function.

    22.2. The general approach to the SWF’s risk management framework should be publicly disclosed.

    Growthfund has established a Risk Management Framework which consists of Risk Management Policy, Governance and Procedures. The fund applies a structured, group-wide methodology to assess and manage the risks of its operations. Risk Assessments are conducted to identify risks which are recorded in a Risk Matrix. The risks are mapped to the taxonomy of the Risk Matrix which consists of the following 5 main categories: Strategic, Operational, Compliance, Financial and Information System risks. The adequacy of existing controls is evaluated, and corrective actions are assigned to responsible executives with clear timelines for implementation. 

     

    The Group Risk Management Division monitors implementation and reports to the Board’s Risk Committee, ensuring alignment with strategic objectives.

     

    Growthfund’s Risk Management Policy enables effective monitoring firstly through three lines of defense model, ensuring accountability across business, risk management, and audit functions. The Group Risk Management Division monitors the risks and periodically reports the results to the Board Risk Committee.

     

    Growthfund’s approach to risk management is publicly disclosed. The fund publishes its Risk Management Policy on its official website, detailing governance structures, methodologies, and procedures for risk identification, assessment, mitigation, and reporting. It also outlines its strategic alignment with best practices and legal obligations, focusing on transparency and accountability. The current Risk Management Policy is available on the fund’s site under the section of Corporate Governance: https://growthfund.gr/en/corporate-governance/risk-management/ 

     

    23. The assets and investment performance (absolute and relative to benchmarks, if any) of the SWF should be measured and reported to the owner according to clearly defined principles or standards.

    Growthfund’s overall performance (both as a group and standalone) is published annually in its financial statements. The sole shareholder (Ministry of Economy & Finance) is not only informed, but it has the right to approve (thus release the fund’s BoD from any liability) or reject the fund’s results, initiating the revocation of its BoD members.

     

    Furthermore, the fund publishes quarterly reports for the parent company, an annual sustainability report, and an annual corporate governance declaration.

    In addition to the above, supplementary provisions for reporting related to investments,  performance of some subsidiaries assigned to deliver some public service, investment returns and transparency overall are set out in the Fund’s Internal Regulation chapter “Performance Monitoring Framework”. Being an integral part of the Fund’s Internal Regulation the Performance Monitoring Framework can be amended only via a General Assembly decision, safeguarding in this way not only the process, but also the minimum contents of the reports that the Fund discloses.

    24. A process of regular review of the implementation of the GAPP should be engaged in by or on behalf of the SWF.

    Growthfund is committed to reviewing the implementation of the GAPP on a bi-annual basis.