IFSWF Santiago Principles

Santiago Principles Self-Assessment®

FSDEA 2025

    Institutional Framework and Governance Structure.
    Principle 6

    6. The governance framework for the SWF should be sound and establish a clear and effective division of roles and responsibilities in order to facilitate accountability and operational independence in the management of the SWF to pursue its objectives.

    In addition to the governance measures mentioned in relation to the Organic Statute, the following describes the organizational structure of FSDEA:

    FSDEA Governance

     

     

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund of Angola has the following structure:

    Governing Bodies:

    • Board of Directors;
    • Fiscal Council (named by Ministry of Finance);
    • Advisory Council (external members named by Ministry of Finance, Economy and the Central Bank).
    • The others governing bodies are as per organic structure above.

     

    objectives

    Presidential Decree No. 216/24 of 21st of October ,  the Investment Policy of the Fund.       Article 2 establishes FSDEA’s mandates which comprises: 

     Saving and wealth transfer, Maximization of returns and Fiscal Stabilization or National Flagship Project for resources specifically allocated for these purposes. 

     

     

    Appointing the governing body

    As Per number 3 of Article 10 of the Organic Statute, “The Board of Directors shall be appointed by the President of the Republic for a term of five (5) years, renewable once.”  

     

    The Fiscal Council is appointed by the Minister of Finance, to whom they submit semi-annual reports on the management of the Fund.

     

    The external auditors shall be appointed annually by the President of the Republic.

     

    The external auditors shall be obliged to submit Auditor reports to the Minister of Finance and to the Board of Directors.

     

    7. The owner should set the objectives of the SWF, appoint the members of its governing body(ies) in accordance with clearly defined procedures, and exercise oversight over the SWF’s operations.

    Duties of the Board

    Article 10 of the Organic Statute lays out the extensive duties of the Board of Directors. The current BoD is composed by members with extensive managerial experience in public, multilateral and private sector. 

     

    Authority of the Board

    Per Article 10 of that document, the Board of Directors is “responsible for all actions required for managing the Fund and carrying out its duties”.

     

    Furthermore, the Article 2 of the Organic Statute states that FSDEA has administrative, financial and asset autonomy which gives adequate authority to the BoD to carry out its functions. 

     

    As for acting in best interest of FSDEA, the BoD as well as other governing bodies must adhere to Public Probity Law which sets the standard of conduct expected from them which includes loyalty and no conflict of interest provisions. 

     

    8. The governing body(ies) should act in the best interests of the SWF, and have a clear mandate and adequate authority and competency to carry out its functions.

    Duties of the Board

    Article 10 of the Organic Statute lays out the extensive duties of the Board of Directors. The current BoD is composed by members with extensive managerial experience in public, multilateral and private sector. 

     

    Authority of the Board

    Per Article 10 of that document, the Board of Directors is “responsible for all actions required for managing the Fund and carrying out its duties”.

     

    Furthermore, the Article 2 of the Organic Statute states that FSDEA has administrative, financial and asset autonomy which gives adequate authority to the BoD to carry out its functions. 

     

    As for acting in best interest of FSDEA, the BoD as well as other governing bodies must adhere to Public Probity Law which sets the standard of conduct expected from them which includes loyalty and no conflict of interest provisions. 

     

    9. The operational management of the SWF should implement the SWF’s strategies in an independent manner and in accordance with clearly defined responsibilities.

    Article 4 of the Regulations (Presidential Decree No. 214/19) establishes that the Board of Directors is responsible for managing the Fund and implementing the Investment Policy. In line with Chapter III of the Organic Statute, the Board approves the organigram, which clearly defines reporting lines, delegates authority, and segregates responsibilities across divisions.

     

    For internally managed portfolios, investment activities are carried out within the respective divisions according to their mandates. For externally managed portfolios, the Board ensures oversight through supervision and monitoring of external asset managers. This structure ensures that the Fund’s strategies are executed independently, with operational management acting in accordance with clearly defined roles and responsibilities.

     

    10. The accountability framework for the SWF’s operations should be clearly defined in the relevant legislation, charter, other constitutive documents, or management agreement.

    The accountability framework for FSDEA is clearly set out in its Organic Statutes, Investment Policy, Management Regulations, and other applicable legislation governing public entities. These instruments define the principles and rules that FSDEA must adhere to in its operations.

     

    The Board of Directors and other governing bodies have roles and responsibilities expressly enshrined in these documents, ensuring clarity in decision-making and management oversight.

     

    FSDEA is subject to independent external audit, and its financial statements are made publicly available, reinforcing transparency. In addition, the Fiscal Council—appointed by the Ministry of Finance and operating independently from FSDEA—monitors the Fund’s activities to ensure compliance with its directives and applicable law.

     

    The Organic Statutes also establish the supervisory role of the Ministry of Finance, including FSDEA’s obligations to submit reports, obtain certain approvals, and comply with oversight requirements.

     

    Furthermore, in accordance with national legislation, FSDEA is subject to inspection and audit by the Tribunal de Contas (Court of Auditors), which provides an additional layer of accountability to safeguard public resources.

     

    11. An annual report and accompanying financial statements on the SWF’s operations and performance should be prepared in a timely fashion and in accordance with recognized international or national accounting standards in a consistent manner.

    FSDEA governing documents establish requirements for regular annual audits and sets the IFRS as the accounting standard adopted. 

     

    The annual report and the financial statements as soon as the audit is completed are published in the widely circulated newspapers and made available on the FSDEA website.  The annual report will, in nutshell, include information regarding investment performance, risk profile, macroeconomic, and financial statements. 

     

    12. The SWF’s operations and financial statements should be audited annually in accordance with recognized international or national auditing standards in a consistent manner.

    FSDEA is regularly audited by highly reputed firms in the (big four), currently EY, in line with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

     

    13. Professional and ethical standards should be clearly defined and made known to the members of the SWF’s governing body(ies), management, and staff.

    All internal policies are accessible by all employees on the FSDEA the intranet.

     

    The Fund has a Code of Conduct with four stated objectives:

    Guarantee compliance with the provisions of the law on the respect of professional duties incumbent upon FSDEA, its employees and third parties

     

    Ensure compliance with legislation and policies on the prevention of corruption and on anti-money laundering and terrorist financing;

     

    Ensure that, in addition to complying with the rules and duties arising from the applicable legal and regulatory provisions, the activities of FSDEA shall be performed in accordance with strict ethical and deontological principles;

     

    Contribute to the promotion an institutional image of rigour, efficiency and competence.

     

    In addition to the compliance rules and policies to which all employees of the Fund are subject, under the terms of current legislation, members of the board of directors are required to present the declaration of assets at the commencement of their duties to the Public Prosecutor's Office.

     

    14. Dealing with third parties for the purpose of the SWF’s operational management should be based on economic and financial grounds, and follow clear rules and procedures.

    FSDEA mandates that its partners and asset managers prioritise return maximization, savings and wealth transfer are grounded on economic and financial rationale. The selection of Investments are made on a risk/return basis. As set out in the Public Procurement Law and internal policy, only those goods and services that are more economically advantageous to FSDEA are chosen.  External managers are chosen based on a competitive process, custodian and other service providers are selected on the economic merit of their proposals. To prevent conflicts of interest or deviations to these operational principles/rules, there is the Code of Conduct and other relevant laws(i.e. Public Probity Law, etc)

     

    15. SWF operations and activities in host countries should be conducted in compliance with all applicable regulatory and disclosure requirements of the countries in which they operate.

    The Management Regulations (Approved by Presidential Decree 214/19)  sets out  in article 4 that FSDEA actions must be in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations of the jurisdictions FSDEA is operating on. 

    16. The governance framework and objectives, as well as the manner in which the SWF’s management is operationally independent from the owner, should be publicly disclosed.

    Article 4 of the Regulations (Presidential Decree 214/19) publicly available on the Fund's website, charges the Board of Directors “with executing and implementing the Investment Policy.” The Board of Directors has full discretion with regard to investment decisions and managerial decisions as long as they are within the boundary defined by the applicable regulations (i.e. Investment Policy, etc).  So, in choosing the options to implement its mandate FSDEA does so independently.

    17. Relevant financial information regarding the SWF should be publicly disclosed to demonstrate its economic and financial orientation, so as to contribute to stability in international financial markets and enhance trust in recipient countries.

    Besides publishing its financial statements and annual reports, FSDEA is also transparent about new investments it makes both in Angola and overseas.  FSDEA recent actions can be consulted on the website. 

    Investment and Risk Management Framework.

    Principle 18

    18. The SWF’s investment policy should be clear and consistent with its defined objectives, risk tolerance, and investment strategy, as set by the owner or the governing body(ies), and be based on sound portfolio management principles.

    18.1. The investment policy should guide the SWF’s financial risk exposures and the possible use of leverage.

    18.2. The investment policy should address the extent to which internal and/or external investment managers are used, the range of their activities and authority, and the process by which they are selected and their performance monitored.

    18.3. A description of the investment policy of the SWF should be publicly disclosed.

    FSDEA’s has an Investment Policy (Presidential Decree 216/24 of 21of October) that addresses all the aspects on principle 18. The investment policy is a public document that is published in the Official Gazette and available on FSDEA´s website. 

    19. The SWF’s investment decisions should aim to maximize risk-adjusted financial returns in a manner consistent with its investment policy, and based on economic and financial grounds.

    19.1. If investment decisions are subject to other than economic and financial considerations, these should be clearly set out in the investment policy and be publicly disclosed.

    19.2. The management of an SWF’s assets should be consistent with what is generally accepted as sound asset management principles.

    FSDEA investment policy sets that investment decisions are made on the risk/return basis given the mandates of return maximization and savings. 

     

    FSDEA hires well reputed External Managers appointed on competitive basis, has a diversified portfolio and adheres to international best practices in management of assets

     

    20. The SWF should not seek or take advantage of privileged information or inappropriate influence by the broader government in competing with private entities.

    FSDEA does not take advantage of privileged information when competing with private entities. When engaging with private entities, it does so in good faith and according to the law.

    21. SWFs view shareholder ownership rights as a fundamental element of their equity investments’ value. If an SWF chooses to exercise its ownership rights, it should do so in a manner that is consistent with its investment policy and protects the financial value of its investments. The SWF should publicly disclose its general approach to voting securities of listed entities, including the key factors guiding its exercise of ownership rights.

    Per Article 6 of Presidential Decree 214/19, “[t]he Fund intends to exercise of Rights in Subsidiaries. The representative / legal representative of the Fund shall, whenever the Fund holds a qualifying holding in an entity, attend meetings of that entity in order to safeguard the rights and interests of the Fund.” Underlying voting decisions is the return maximization objective which restricts FSDEA to only take voting action that protect and maximize value of its investments.

    22. The SWF should have a framework that identifies, assesses, and manages the risks of its operations.

    22.1. The risk management framework should include reliable information and timely reporting systems, which should enable the adequate monitoring and management of relevant risks within acceptable parameters and levels, control and incentive mechanisms, codes of conduct, business continuity planning, and an independent audit function.

    22.2. The general approach to the SWF’s risk management framework should be publicly disclosed.

    FSDEA has a risk management framework that feeds on the portfolio information on custodian platform which are readily accessible. The exposures to different portfolios are monitored against limits and reported periodically to the relevant Committees and BoD. External and internal managers are provided with guidelines and the risk management framework monitors adherence to them and also. FSDEA has internal audit function that independently checks on the control systems and environment.

    23. The assets and investment performance (absolute and relative to benchmarks, if any) of the SWF should be measured and reported to the owner according to clearly defined principles or standards.

    FSDEA investments, especially the listed ones, are made with reference to benchmarks. So, the performance is measured and reported also on relative basis. The alternative investments(assets) are subject to annual valuation by independent entity which also considered in external audit process. 

     

    24. A process of regular review of the implementation of the GAPP should be engaged in by or on behalf of the SWF.

     As per Article 7 of Presidential Decree 214/19:

     

    “3. The Fund undertakes to ensure the inclusion and implementation of the Santiago Principles on reporting and dissemination of information.”